FIFA President Gianni Infantino is facing criticism from environmental groups over his extensive private-jet travel and the 2026 World Cup's carbon footprint.

This scrutiny highlights a growing tension between the expansion of global sporting events and international climate goals. As FIFA expands its tournament format, critics argue the organization is undermining its own sustainability commitments.

The 2026 World Cup will be staged across 16 host cities [3] in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. This expanded format includes 48 teams [1] and a total of 104 scheduled matches [2]. The geographic spread of the event is expected to significantly increase greenhouse-gas emissions compared to previous tournaments.

Environmentalists have warned that the carbon footprint of the 2026 event could be approximately double [4] that of the 2022 Qatar World Cup. The increase is attributed to the larger number of teams and the vast distances between the North American host cities.

Beyond the tournament's structural emissions, Infantino's personal travel has become a focal point for critics. His frequent use of private jets during the World Cup draw and related events this month has drawn condemnation from media outlets in Europe and North America.

Critics said the president's travel habits contradict FIFA's public statements regarding environmental responsibility. The discrepancy between the organization's sustainability rhetoric and the actual emissions generated by its leadership and event structure has led to increased pressure for transparency regarding the tournament's total climate cost.

The carbon footprint of the 2026 event could be approximately double that of the 2022 Qatar World Cup.

The controversy underscores the logistical challenge of hosting a multi-national sporting event while adhering to global emission reduction targets. By increasing the number of teams and the geographic scale of the tournament, FIFA has prioritized commercial and inclusive growth over environmental impact, creating a potential reputational risk as climate accountability becomes a standard metric for international organizations.