Pundits at MS NOW labeled Elon Musk a “white supremacist” as his net worth approached $1 trillion [1].
The comments highlight a growing ideological divide between the world's wealthiest individuals and the media outlets that track their influence. As Musk's financial power grows, critics increasingly view his platform and wealth as a threat to social stability.
The labels emerged in early 2024 when Musk neared the milestone of becoming the first trillion-dollar individual [1]. Mediaite reported that the pundits at the U.S.-based outlet MS NOW used the term during discussions regarding his wealth and public influence [1].
Gabriella Power of Sky News Australia addressed the situation, noting the reaction from specific media sectors. "Let’s look at the media's reaction, of course, there are plenty in the leftist media who hate Donald Trump, they hate Elon Musk, and they are now running with this Elon is a white supremacist angle," Power said [2].
This criticism of Musk is not limited to political pundits. In a separate instance reported by Yahoo News Canada, singer Billie Eilish described Musk as "pathetic" [3].
The backlash appears tied to the intersection of Musk's ownership of X and his financial status. Critics argue that extreme wealth allows individuals to bypass traditional media gatekeepers, a shift that has led to increased friction between Musk and several U.S. news organizations [1].
While the "white supremacist" label was specifically attributed to MS NOW pundits, other reports on Musk's wealth have focused on the economic implications of a single individual holding $1 trillion [1].
“MS NOW pundits ripped Elon Musk for being a "white supremacist" as he became the first trillionaire.”
The labeling of Elon Musk as a white supremacist by media pundits reflects the intensifying polarization surrounding high-net-worth individuals who control major communication platforms. By linking Musk's financial milestones to ideological accusations, these outlets are framing the debate not as one of economic inequality, but as a conflict over cultural and political power.
