The Supreme Court of India has asked the Union Government for a response to a petition seeking an alternative to Jantar Mantar for protests [1, 2].
The case centers on whether the current designated protest area in Delhi is suitable given its location. Moving these demonstrations could alter how citizens exercise their right to assembly near the seat of power.
The petitioner said that Jantar Mantar is an unsuitable site because of its proximity to Parliament and the Central Vista [1]. The filing said that the location of other government establishments in the area creates security concerns and leads to unnecessary disruption [1].
As a solution, the petition suggested that the government establish a separate, dedicated venue for public demonstrations [1, 2]. Proposed alternatives include Ramlila Maidan, or another large, secure ground that could accommodate crowds without impacting government operations [1, 2].
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta appeared during the proceedings as the court sought the Centre's position on the matter [2]. The court has not yet ruled on the petition but requires the government's formal reply to determine if a relocation is feasible or necessary [1, 2].
“The Supreme Court has asked the Union Government for a response to a petition seeking an alternative to Jantar Mantar.”
This legal challenge highlights the tension between the fundamental right to peaceful protest and the state's interest in security and administrative efficiency. If the court approves a move to a more remote location like Ramlila Maidan, it may reduce the visibility of protesters to lawmakers, potentially shifting the dynamic of public advocacy in the capital.
