President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on Thursday that would deny birthright citizenship to children of certain non-citizen foreigners [1].

The move challenges a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment. If upheld, these orders would fundamentally change who is eligible for automatic citizenship upon birth on U.S. soil.

The administration said the actions are intended to curb "birth tourism" [2]. The orders aim to limit the number of people who obtain citizenship by being born in the U.S. to specific foreign nationals [2].

"I am once more trying to limit the number of people who…" Trump said [3].

Legal challenges were immediate. Three federal judges have already issued temporary blocks against the orders [4]. These judicial interventions prevent the administration from enforcing the restrictions while the courts determine if the actions are constitutional [5].

This is not the first time the administration has faced judicial setbacks regarding immigration mandates. On June 30, 2023, the Supreme Court struck down a broader executive order issued by the administration [6].

The current orders focus specifically on the citizenship status of children born to non-citizens. By targeting "birth tourism," the administration seeks to remove the incentive for foreign nationals to travel to the U.S. specifically to ensure their children receive citizenship [2].

President Donald Trump signed two executive orders on Thursday that would deny birthright citizenship to children of certain non-citizen foreigners.

These executive orders represent a direct challenge to the principle of jus soli, or right of the soil, which has historically granted citizenship to nearly everyone born in the U.S. regardless of parentage. Because three federal judges have already blocked the orders, the matter is likely headed for a protracted legal battle that may eventually return to the Supreme Court to decide if a president can override constitutional birthright citizenship via executive action.